僵尸先生

Assimilation, Exploitation & Discrimination: The Unenviable Fate of Canada’s Indigenous Peoples_我的网站

A |     Pope Francis’s July 24-29 tour of Canada included a long-overdue apology to Native Canadians for the Catholic Church’s central role in abuses perpetrated at the country’s network of residential schools.,The notorious boarding school system was funded and organized by Canada’s federal government and run by Catholic and Protestant churches. It oversaw the forceful and systematic assimilation, abuse, enslavement and even murder of Native Canadian boys and girls from the mid-19th to late 20th centuries. It was a particularly brutal and cruel, but by no means first or only, tool of oppression experienced by indigenous peoples during the European colonialists’ history in North America.,“I am here because the first step of my penitential pilgrimage among you is that of again asking forgiveness, of telling you once more that I am deeply sorry. Sorry for the ways in which, regrettably, many Christians supported the colonizing mentality of the powers that oppressed the indigenous peoples. I am sorry. I ask for forgiveness, in particular, for the ways in which many members of the Church and of religious communities cooperated, not least through their indifference, in projects of cultural destruction and forced assimilation promoted by the governments of that time, which culminated in the system of residential schools,” Francis said at the former site of the Ermineskin Residential School in Maskwacis, Alberta on July 25.,The pope assured his apology was “only the first step” of “a serious investigation into the facts of what took place in the past and to assist the survivors of the residential schools to experience healing from the traumas they suffered.”,Pope Francis Holds Mass in Quebec During Visit to Canada to Apologize to Indigenous Community28 July, 13:01 GMT,Assimilation,More than 150,000 Native children passed through the residential school system over its 160+ year history. Children were prohibited, often by physical punishment, from speaking their native languages, having their ancestors’ religious concepts replaced with Christianity, and facing their cultural traditions and social norms substituted for those of the colonialists.,The first experimental residential school was opened in Brantford, Ontario, in 1833, but the system only became a federally-mandated, national, industrial-scale tool of subjugation in the 1880s after Sir John A Macdonald, Canada’s first prime minister, ordered the commissioning of a report on the residential school system model being operated in the United States.,The report, entitled ‘Industrial Schools for Indians and Half-Breeds’, became the basis for Canadian state-church cooperation in solving the Indian “problem” by removing indigenous children from the influences passed down to them by their communities and family units.,© WikipediaIndian Residential School, (Fort) Resolution, Northwest TerritoriesIndian Residential School, (Fort) Resolution, Northwest Territories© Wikipedia,Along with forced assimilation, students were subjected to other forms of torment, including sexual abuse by priests and teachers, forced labor, and slavery. As of 2021, the National Center for Truth and Reconciliation has been able to identify 4,117 documented deaths of First Nations, Inuit and Metis children in residential schools. However, new graves continue to be discovered, and former Truth and Reconciliation Commissioner Murray Sinclair estimates that more than 6,000 children may have died in the residential school system over the period of its operation.,In his bombshell 2016 book “Murder by Decree: the Crime of Genocide in Canada,” writer and former United Church of Canada reverend Kevin Annett challenged the NCTR over its conservative estimates on the residential school deaths, detailing the commission’s suppression of eyewitness testimony and archival documentation, and estimating that the true death toll may have run in the tens of thousands. Annett documented how the system included a monthly “death quota” and involved the use of germ warfare, and believes that as many as 50,000 children may have perished in the residential school network.,Exploitation,Residential schools were by no means the first instance of settlers’ mistreatment of Canada’s indigenous population, with Britain’s victory against the French in the North American theater of the Seven Years’ War of 1754-1763 sealing their fate of subjugation and colonial land grabs, as well as the relentless and cynical exploitation of the most loyal tribes.,At the conclusion of the war in 1763, King George III issued a royal proclamation declaring all lands west of the Appalachian Mountains and the colonies of what would ultimately become the early United States as Native territories, outlawing their settlement or purchase by colonialists, and requiring treaty negotiations for any changes to the arrangement. In Canada –organized from the remnants of New France under the name ‘Quebec’, lands to the west and north of the colony were proclaimed Indian territory.,Centuries later, scholars continue to fiercely debate the correct interpretation of the proclamation, and whether it was meant as a permanent guarantee of Native rights to lands beyond the then-existent colonies, or a mere opportunity for colonists to catch their breath before continuing an aggressive push west.,© Photo"The British Governments in Nth America Laid down agreeable to the Proclamation of Octr. 7, 1763," Gentleman’s Magazine (London, 1763)"The British Governments in Nth America Laid down agreeable to the Proclamation of Octr. 7, 1763," Gentleman’s Magazine (London, 1763)© Photo,Even as colonists repeatedly broke the 1763 treaty’s terms throughout the rest of the 18th and 19th centuries through wars of aggression and by taking advantage of divisions within Native tribes through cunning and trickery, many Natives remained loyal to the Crown.,Perhaps nowhere was this better exemplified than in the story of Joseph Brant, an 18th-century Mohawk military and political leader who led his warriors in defense of the British Empire during the American Revolutionary War of 1775-1783, and whose efforts proved decisive in halting an American advance into what is now Canada.,In return for the loyalty shown by Brant and his fellow Mohawks, Quebec Governor Sir Frederick Haldimand promised that after the war, his people would be granted more than 8,090 square km of land around the Grand River Basin in southern Ontario. However, after the war ended in 1783, the settlers would gradually chip away at their commitments, with the Native-administered area now known as the Six Nations Reserve shrinking to just 183 square km of land, two percent of what Brant was originally promised.,Brant’s story was repeated in one form or another throughout the 19th century, and today just 0.36 percent of Canada’s total landmass has reserve status for its Native communities.,© Wikipedia / National Archives of CanadaJoseph Brant, watercolour by William ArmstrongJoseph Brant, watercolour by William Armstrong© Wikipedia / National Archives of Canada,Discrimination,Notwithstanding decades of recognition by successive governments of the historical injustices done to indigenous people, and lip service to improving their social and economic standing, Canada’s community of 1.67 million Natives continues to struggle with a broad spectrum of problems more typically characterizing countries of the so-called Third World than of a thriving, highly developed First World nation.,The Council of Canadians estimates that some 73 percent of First Nations’ water systems are at medium or high risk of contamination, with dozens of indigenous communities still lacking basic access to clean drinking water, despite billions of dollars in aid doled out by Ottawa every year to developing countries, and over a billion dollars in support sent to Kiev this year amid the Ukrainian security crisis.,Along almost every social indicator, from poverty and access to housing to crime, education, and healthcare, Native communities continue to rank below other Canadians. Nowhere is this exemplified better than in average life expectancy. While other Canadian men and women live on average to an age of 79 and 84 years, respectively, among the First Nations, Metis and Inuit, these figures drop to 72.5 for men and 77.7 for women.。    文 | 顾远山编辑 | 顾远山“难怪李沁没有落座，就微博之夜主办方对她的这态度，她能够落座才奇怪吧！”好不容易在2025年1月11日等来了2024微博之夜，却不承想，这微博之夜一经到来便让不少网友打心底的失望。整个活动大搞区别对待也就罢了，真正让网友们没办法的忍受的还是会场座次的安排。正常活动应当是能力越高的艺人座次越往前，可今年的微博之夜却反其道而行之，让真正有能力的艺人座次靠后。就拿身为圈内风云人物之一的李沁为例，能力与热度皆高的她就被安排到了那些远不如她的后辈后面。

B | 虽说李沁素来低调又与人为善，可面对此等荒唐安排，却也很难无动于衷。进场没多久的她，在看到座次安排后，连落座都没能落座，便“愤然离场”，一点面子都不愿给主办方。一开始网友们还以为李沁在耍什么大牌，可当了解到内情后，却惊讶地发现，李沁哪里在耍什么大牌？分明是主办方在对她百般刁难！本文信源来自权威报道【2024微博之夜】【百度百科】（详细信源附在文章末尾）。为提升文章可读性，细节可能存在润色，请理智阅读，仅供参考!光领奖却不落座，一等结束便“愤然离场”在得知自己收到2024微博之夜的邀请后，李沁心里那叫一个激动，她觉得自己的能力再一次受到了权威肯定。再加上这将是她第一次参加微博之夜的缘故，激动地李沁对这场活动表现得很用心，也很重视。如果说其他明星参加这样的活动，撑死也就准备件精致的高定，可用心的李沁却跟他们截然不同。走红毯的时候穿着一件精致又梦幻的粉色羽毛长裙，乍一看就像是个天鹅公主似的，而当赶往内场领奖的时候，用心的李沁又专门换上了一件，尽显优雅与高级的黑金色系礼服，来以此完美适配颁奖场合。为了不在活动上出现些许纰漏，李沁几乎可以说全程在活动中展现出了自己最好的模样。只见参加该场活动的她举止优雅，还全程面带微笑，甚至还愿意去耐心地配合该活动那冗长到极点的活动流程。

C | 虽然麻烦了点，可李沁却不以为意，她觉得即将在该活动荣获“微博年度质感演员”奖的自己，本就该尽可能地跟主办方打配合。

D | 然而当李沁满心欢喜地“熬”到了领奖之后，主办方的荒唐表现，却让希望去打好配合的她异常失望。

E | 还没等获奖的李沁发表获奖感言呢，她就与高叶、钟楚曦等“微博年度质感演员”获奖者们一起被主办方匆匆赶下台。如果都被这样对待，那网友们心里倒还不会对主办方有什么意见，可问题是并非如此！在赵丽颖、王宝强等红人登上奖台的时候，他们都能拥有极长时间来发表获奖感言，然而等李沁、钟楚曦这样并不算红火的艺人上台领奖的时候，却连个发表获奖感言的时间都没有。

F | “这不是区别对待是什么？”以至于在事发后，网友们纷纷为李沁、钟楚曦等人鸣不平，他们并不觉得“不红是原罪”。可让人痛心的是在微博之夜主办方这里，不红就是原罪。并不红火的她不仅连个发表获奖感言的时间都没有，甚至连在会场上的座次都被安排得相当边缘。虽说相比于赵丽颖、王宝强这样的明星而言，李沁的热度并不算高，可身为实力派演员跟央视宠儿的李沁，在绝大多数活动的座次，都是雷打不动的第一排——毕竟艺人是靠实力说话，而不是热度。可让网友们觉得荒唐的是，那个在其他活动坐第一排的李沁，在来到微博之夜后，却只能坐着最为可怜的第四排，甚至坐的还是第四排的外侧。

G | 如果说坐在李沁前面的，都是像闫妮、黄晓明、马龙樊振东这样的顶级牛人也就罢了，可问题是真的如此吗？的确，在热度上李沁并不如一些演员，可在实力上她却无愧于艺人的第一档。然而就是这样的实力派演员，在座次上甚至还不如因《封神》爆红的新生代演员于适，跟那位叫陈哲远的“流量小生”。

H | 为何如此呢？在网友看来不是因为李沁没实力，仅仅只是因为她没热度。也正是因为她没有热度，在这个活动上竟连个镜头都没有多少。不过这也并非难以预料的事情，在这个热度至上的微博之夜，热度低的李沁不被主办方边缘化才奇怪吧？面对这样的对待，即便再怎么懂得忍耐的李沁，到底还是忍无可忍了，一将奖项给领到了手，便愤然离场。只是看着李沁离场时的落寞身影，网友们却有些唏嘘，娱乐圈的人情冷暖竟在李沁身上体现得淋漓尽致。曾被众星拱月的她却渐渐“大不如前”放眼整个娱乐圈，开局能像李沁那么好的演员却是屈指可数。

I | 才刚刚成年（2008年），在上戏附属戏曲学院中学习昆曲的李沁便在机缘巧合下被李少红导演看中，说什么也要让她出演《红楼梦》（2010年版）少年时期的薛宝钗一角。两年后，这版《红楼梦》一经播出，她就因为把薛宝钗演得太好，不仅开始小有名气，还荣获了金南方年度最受媒体关注奖和最佳新人奖等多个大奖。而这还仅仅只是开始，在靠《红楼梦》崭露锋芒后，初踏演艺圈的她又先后受到了《建党伟业》《中国1921》《神奇侠侣》等多部大制作的主演邀请，甚至还因此而越来越红，越来越红，一举成了演艺圈的“超新星”。彼时的李沁红到什么程度呢？不仅古天乐、陈坤、刘亦菲、黄晓明这些顶级艺人是她演戏的搭档，就连杨幂、赵丽颖这样的知名大牌还都曾给她作配。那时的李沁，在圈内完全就是一副被众星拱月的模样，要多风光，就能有多么风光。然而正当所有人都以为李沁这样的“超新星”能一直在演艺圈这样发展下去的时候，却不承想她身上的麻烦却接二连三地到来。在爆红以后，有人骂她背信弃义，因为曾身为昆曲闺门旦的她，却在爆红后改换门庭，不演昆曲，跑去演戏。虽说有一部分网友能够理解李沁，但此事发酵却仍让李沁的口碑受到了不少影响。当然这也只是原因之一，真正招致李沁落寞的，还是她的事业发展。明明资源极好，戏也演得不差，可不知怎么的，在出演完《花开半夏》后，李沁的事业便一直不温不火。这情况别说进一步发展了，就连想要保持当下的“热度”都有些困难。而这种不温不火，还一直持续至今。话虽如此，但靠着过硬的实力，李沁的奖却仍是拿到手软。从2018年的白玉兰奖最佳女配，到2018年百花奖最佳女主，再到2019年东京国际电影节金鹤奖最佳女配角，以及2020年华鼎奖的十佳演员……李沁靠过硬实力将各种奖项拿到手软，唯一美中不足的是，虽说实力极高，可就是这热度，却略显逊色。结语：娱乐圈到底是个名利场，比起艺人的能力，他们更看重艺人的名气，李沁的座次被这么安排，也就不怎么奇怪了。[免责声明]文章描述过程、图片都来源于网络，此文章旨在倡导社会正能量，无低俗等不良引导。如涉及版权或者人物侵权问题，请及时联系我们，我们将第一时间删除内容！如有事件存疑部分，联系后即刻删除或作出更改。本文信源来自权威报道【2024微博之夜】【百度百科】。

Current article:http://3zm.senchuoshaozaodidia.shop/list_dcg/ulkvlno.html

Published on:00:00:00